public inbox for cgen@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>,
	binutils@sources.redhat.com, cgen@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa] FRV input files
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 19:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16057.23584.595530.27519@casey.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EB95197.70405@redhat.com>

Andrew Cagney writes:
 > Having the FSF distribute this code under anything other than the 
 > standard GPL would be an "improvised license change".

Ah, so if I wanted to add, say, a regexp package to Binutils releases
and use it in libopcodes, I'd have to make it GPL right?
[no answers from the peanut gallery please, I want to hear Andrew's opinion]

 > I [wearing a Red Hat] can't dictate the licencing terms under which the 
 > FSF distributes these FSF (C) files.

Strawman.  Who said anything about dictating.

 > > Also, I'm not sure I want *.cpu to say it's part of Binutils.
 > 
 > A file identified as being part of "binutils", is covered by an FSF 
 > "binutils" assignment.  This makes everyones life a lot easier.

Easier for who and why?

  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-07 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <3EB31259.8050603@redhat.com>
2003-05-03  1:07 ` Doug Evans
2003-05-03  1:10   ` Doug Evans
     [not found]   ` <3EB40A72.1060304@redhat.com>
2003-05-03 20:37     ` Doug Evans
     [not found]       ` <3EB43D55.7000508@redhat.com>
2003-05-03 23:21         ` Doug Evans
2003-05-04 11:27         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2003-05-04 15:13           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-05 13:36             ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2003-05-06 21:42               ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-07 16:20                 ` Doug Evans
2003-05-07 18:34                   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-07 19:19                     ` Doug Evans [this message]
2003-05-07 19:46                       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-07 19:56                       ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16057.23584.595530.27519@casey.transmeta.com \
    --to=dje@transmeta.com \
    --cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=cagney@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgen@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).