From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cgen-return-1650-listarch-cgen=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26801 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2005 18:40:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cgen-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cgen/>
List-Post: <mailto:cgen@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cgen-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26159 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2005 18:40:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neon-gw.transmeta.com) (63.209.4.196)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2005 18:40:48 -0000
Received: from victor.transmeta.com (victor.transmeta.com [10.0.2.120])
	by neon-gw.transmeta.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD665F803F;
	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:40:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.transmeta.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E21B4F802D;
	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:40:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from victor.transmeta.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (victor [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10022) with LMTP
 id 12817-05-92; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:40:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from casey.transmeta.com (casey.transmeta.com [10.10.25.22])
	by victor.transmeta.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EEA4F802C;
	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:40:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dje@localhost)
	by casey.transmeta.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id j0RIemH24121;
	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:40:48 -0800
From: Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16889.13744.130693.210940@casey.transmeta.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:40:00 -0000
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Cc: cgen@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Porting CGEN to other Scheme implementations
In-Reply-To: <vt2u0p2spes.fsf@zenia.home>
References: <vt2u0p2spes.fsf@zenia.home>
X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2

Jim Blandy writes:
 > 
 > I'm interested in porting CGEN to MzScheme.  MzScheme has an active
 > development community, and (of particular interest to Red Hat) an
 > actively maintained Scheme-to-C compiler.  I'd like to talk about how
 > I'm thinking of approaching it, and see what folks think.

How good is the debugging capabilities of MzScheme?
Compared to Guile?  1/2 :-)

OOC, how come Redhat has a particular interest in a Scheme-to-C compiler?

btw, one day I want to port CGEN to Rscheme, for fun's sake.