From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: cgen@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Implementation Language Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 14:52:00 -0000 Message-id: <20000806175233.C8142@redhat.com> References: <14729.40545.762999.300037@casey.transmeta.com> <14732.19435.667853.528542@casey.transmeta.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q3/msg00033.html Hi - dje wrote: > > Can you expand? I don't really consider the performance of code generation > > to be that critical -- look at G++ these days. > > Also look at how long cgen takes to run vs the gen* fns in gcc. [...] Right, though continuing to keep generated files cached in CVS at least limits the pain to active developers instead of everyone. > btw, I'm playing with Rscheme a lot these days. [...] Looks nice, but them nonstandard extensions sure look addictive. - FChE -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE5jd4hVZbdDOm/ZT0RAYeGAJ4501afmc/aM1XQKD6O5BzQMLJ0AQCfYvrc lWW5l1DyBsq4NXrBgvZ6UoA= =HCrF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----