From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Ben Elliston Cc: cgen@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: simulation; vliw targets; writeback tracking bitstring overflow Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:04:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010128230442.A10997@redhat.com> References: <20010125173953.B915@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg00090.html Hi - On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 01:25:40PM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote: : Anyway, this needs to get fixed. A couple of alternatives are: : : - widening the bitfield to "unsigned long long" : - adopting a separate per-field indicator variable : - (since I'm interested in sid -> C++) adopting a std::bitset type : : What are the runtime memory requirements for moving to unsigned long long? Effectively immeasurably small: an extra 4 bytes in an scache struct and semantic function stack frame. It's not really a big issue either way. - FChE -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6dOvaVZbdDOm/ZT0RAvAxAJ9voCBZI7ZQ8rJ+KzlpwjWqkfvXRQCfdN/b q0rFopFXMsbylOpGGOvd1tI= =FKDq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----