From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Ben Elliston Cc: cgen@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: better handling of unknown operands Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:03:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010321080301.D17011@redhat.com> References: <15030.45147.804718.597177@scooby.apac.redhat.com> <15032.22278.525106.539421@scooby.apac.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg00186.html Hi - : Ben> More generally, shouldn't cgen complain about any operand that appears : Ben> in the syntax string but not the field format list, or : Ben> vice-versa? : : I haven't heard any comments on this [...] It's not quite like that -- keep in mind ifields that embody padding or reserved bits, and need no mentino in the syntax string. - FChE -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6uKaFVZbdDOm/ZT0RAtP2AJ0b8WRTSLm0nuW36vYQAKGP9CN3RwCffuhp Xp1Px4IPd1yTVkreTDbOZYs= =Nq44 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----