From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com>
To: fche@redhat.com
Cc: cgen@sources.redhat.com
Subject: insn-word-bitsize
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 16:19:00 -0000
Message-id: <200107092319.QAA19491@casey.transmeta.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q3/msg00034.html

I wrote:
>Ah.  Then I don't have a problem with the patch _providing_
>word[-_]bitsize is renamed (say insn[-_]word[-_]bitsize).

btw, just so there's no misunderstanding,
what I'm suggesting is adding insn-word-bitsize, not replacing word-bitsize
with insn-word-bitsize (i.e. rename word-bitsize in your patch).

Hmmm... I just grepped for it, insn-word-bitsize is already there!