From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21205 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2002 18:36:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20856 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2002 18:35:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO toenail.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2002 18:35:52 -0000 Received: (from fche@localhost) by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g11IZoG03802; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:35:50 -0500 Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 10:36:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Andrew Cagney Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, cgen@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: include/dis-asm.h patch for cgen disassemblers Message-ID: <20020201133550.E2190@redhat.com> References: <20020131124350.C19966@redhat.com> <15449.42904.232177.265525@casey.transmeta.com> <20020131162132.I19966@redhat.com> <15449.47582.575411.945069@casey.transmeta.com> <20020201131309.C2190@redhat.com> <3C5ADE20.10203@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0H629O+sVkh21xTi" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3C5ADE20.10203@cygnus.com>; from ac131313@cygnus.com on Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:27:44PM -0500 X-SW-Source: 2002-q1/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 --0H629O+sVkh21xTi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 643 Hi - cagney wrote: > [...] > I would put it the other way round. Users use disassembler_options to=20 > principaly do select assembly syntax and the like. They override the=20 > default mode. Have you looked at the opcodes/ code? Most of the disassembler_option substrings enable and disable groups of opcodes (instruction sets) for decoding. That's deeper than assembly syntax. How an end-user performs this picking, and why she should have to pick manually at all, are separate issues. > > OK. Anyone with objections? > You mean like my constant questioning? Nah, those are more like cries for general elucidation. :-) - FChE --0H629O+sVkh21xTi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 232 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8WuAGVZbdDOm/ZT0RAm90AJ49xVwQsWTm+Ibf2KRuxB1K8LLxYQCdHjvn /GqC+ni9KqemqYrnf7pFay4= =3CwL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0H629O+sVkh21xTi--