From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5113 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2002 15:00:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5082 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2002 15:00:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO krynn.axis.se) (193.13.178.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Jun 2002 15:00:09 -0000 Received: from ignucius.axis.se (root@ignucius.axis.se [10.13.1.18]) by krynn.axis.se (8.12.2/8.12.2/Debian -5) with ESMTP id g5OF07S3018146; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:00:07 +0200 Received: (from hp@localhost) by ignucius.axis.se (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id RAA06310; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:00:07 +0200 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 08:00:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200206241500.RAA06310@ignucius.axis.se> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson To: dje@transmeta.com CC: hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com, cgen@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <15635.31439.589711.692123@casey.transmeta.com> (message from Doug Evans on Fri, 21 Jun 2002 12:13:19 -0700 (PDT)) Subject: Re: [RFA:] Fix lsb? bug with insn fields beyond base insn size. X-SW-Source: 2002-q2/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 > From: Doug Evans > Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 12:13:19 -0700 (PDT) > Not something of your making, but one thing that can be cleaned > up in -gen-extract-word is it's use of current-arch-insn-lsb0?. > Either it should use the lsb0? argument, or the lsb0? argument > should be removed. I don't have a strong preference which. I'll convert it to use the lsb0? argument. brgds, H-P