From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cgen-return-1180-listarch-cgen=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 22311 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2002 20:11:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cgen-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cgen/>
List-Post: <mailto:cgen@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cgen-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 22297 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2002 20:11:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2002 20:11:13 -0000
Received: from toenail.toronto.redhat.com (toenail.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.211])
	by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9C03F800087; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:11:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from fche@localhost)
	by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gBBKBAC30884;
	Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:11:10 -0500
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:11:00 -0000
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com>
Cc: cgen@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: strange "a la m32r" comment in cgen-dis.in
Message-ID: <20021211151108.B16403@redhat.com>
References: <200212111955.LAA25907@xris-athlon.transmeta.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <200212111955.LAA25907@xris-athlon.transmeta.com>; from dje@transmeta.com on Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:55:25AM -0800
X-SW-Source: 2002-q4/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2


--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-length: 408

Hi -

dje wrote:
> I don't understand the "possibly modified" part of this comment.
> cgen-dis.in:
>   /* Fill in ex_info fields like read_insn would.  Don't actually call
>      read_insn, since the incoming buffer is already read (and possibly
>      modified a la m32r).  */
> Can you elaborate? [...]

I suspect I was referring to the modifications of buf[]
in cgen/cpu/m32r.opc (my_print_insn).

- FChE

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-length: 189

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE995vcVZbdDOm/ZT0RAhpsAJ9yXm0oWQlIisMXlEBGYhrde1dh2wCghy9X
MhydztVHZhDG6mQdYS44uEY=
=k8ka
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--