From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cgen-return-1434-listarch-cgen=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 21853 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2003 00:26:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cgen-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cgen/>
List-Post: <mailto:cgen@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cgen-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 21844 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2003 00:26:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neon-gw.transmeta.com) (63.209.4.196)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jul 2003 00:26:45 -0000
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by neon-gw.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA29482
	for <cgen@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:26:39 -0700
Received: from mailhost.transmeta.com(10.1.1.15) by neon-gw.transmeta.com via smap (V2.1)
	id xma029467; Tue, 15 Jul 03 17:26:10 -0700
Received: from casey.transmeta.com (casey.transmeta.com [10.10.25.22])
	by deepthought.transmeta.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6G0QEF20066
	for <cgen@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from dje@localhost) by casey.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id RAA22246; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:26:14 -0700
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:26:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200307160026.RAA22246@casey.transmeta.com>
From: Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com>
To: cgen@sources.redhat.com
Subject: guile 1.6.4 a bit faster?
X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2

While the explicit symbol/string conversions introduce some minimal slowness
on the cgen side, guile 1.6.4 appears to be faster thus making up for it.
[or maybe the gcc that compiled 1.6.4 is much improved over the gcc
that compiled 1.3 :-)  guess I should verify that ...]

This is to generate all opcodes files with a sample size of 3, whoop de do.

guile 1.3:
94.89user 1.04system 1:41.28elapsed 94%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
94.78user 0.79system 1:40.96elapsed 94%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
94.89user 0.91system 1:42.35elapsed 93%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k

guile 1.6.4:
82.38user 0.93system 1:28.39elapsed 94%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
82.32user 0.88system 1:28.63elapsed 93%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
82.46user 0.78system 1:28.60elapsed 93%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k