From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cgen-return-1437-listarch-cgen=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 11334 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2003 10:12:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cgen-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cgen/>
List-Post: <mailto:cgen@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cgen-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 11326 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2003 10:12:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jul 2003 10:12:21 -0000
Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19cjEa-0007GD-00
	for <cgen@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:10:04 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cgen@sources.redhat.com
Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19cj7O-0006jo-00
	for <gmane-comp-tools-cgen-devel@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:02:38 +0200
From: Ben Elliston <bje@wasabisystems.com>
Subject: Re: guile 1.6.4 a bit faster?
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:52:00 -0000
Message-ID: <87ptkbvv6j.fsf@sashimi.wasabisystems.com>
References: <200307160026.RAA22246@casey.transmeta.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2
Message-ID: <20030716155200.QuvZVzpys2rLbKiZIy2qf1uhdL5nxnCUDwN6aVPpBG0@z>

Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com> writes:

> While the explicit symbol/string conversions introduce some minimal
> slowness on the cgen side, guile 1.6.4 appears to be faster thus
> making up for it.  [or maybe the gcc that compiled 1.6.4 is much
> improved over the gcc that compiled 1.3 :-) guess I should verify
> that ...]

So are you now getting over the demise of Hobbit? :-)

Ben