From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23866 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2003 16:47:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23859 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2003 16:47:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.msmarts.com) (66.127.92.140) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 2003 16:47:33 -0000 Received: from lisa.msmarts.com (192.168.1.199 [192.168.1.199]) by mail.msmarts.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id RYQ4KXQR; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 08:43:47 -0800 From: Ralph Escherich To: Ben Elliston Subject: Re: binutils porting to new CPU Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:47:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9.1i Cc: cgen@sources.redhat.com References: <20031029165027.GA30779@redhat.com> <200310292147.31532.esche@mobilesmartsinc.com> <87ad7ji5st.fsf@wasabisystems.com> In-Reply-To: <87ad7ji5st.fsf@wasabisystems.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200310300848.55978.esche@mobilesmartsinc.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-q4/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 > Are you using latest sources for both from CVS? No, I'm using binutils-2.14. For cgen I'm using the latest CVS snap. I couldn't get the scheme code going with release 1.0. The binutils do not come with cgen included, not even the CVS snapshots posted on the FTP site. BTW. I seems you where right. The openrisc in the official release is not named openrisc, but or32. (checked last night) So its probably old stuff I'm looking at. Which CPU port would be an easy one to get started with? Esche