From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4336 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2003 09:20:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4275 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 09:20:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bubble.modra.org) (144.136.188.60) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 09:20:24 -0000 Received: by bubble.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7339084CBA; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:50:20 +1030 (CST) Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:20:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra To: Doug Evans Cc: cgen@sources.redhat.com, Johan Rydberg Subject: Re: unreviewed patch anniversary Message-ID: <20031204092020.GA18911@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> References: <20031204064036.GO24150@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <16334.59349.18307.37032@casey.transmeta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16334.59349.18307.37032@casey.transmeta.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-q4/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:52:53PM -0800, Doug Evans wrote: > Alan Modra writes: > > The cpu/openrisc.opc part of the following has never been reviewed. > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cgen/2002-q4/msg00045.html > > The openrisc.opc change is fine with me > (pedantic: assuming it's been tested, which I'm sure it has, or was ...). It's been tested to death. :) openrisc-elf happens to be one of the targets that I use when testing for binutils regressions. > Also, pedantically (sorry!), one might want to check with the openrisc Who's that? jrydberg@rtmk.org? > maintainer which I'm guessing isn't on this list, but for something > like this it's probably overkill. Yes, it is a rather simple and obvious set of changes. I'm taking your comment about overkill as licence to commit. I've committed it, and cc'd Johan. -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre