From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18023 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2006 22:07:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 17861 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2006 22:07:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:07:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k03M7Fq6010444; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:07:15 -0500 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k03M7A128844; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:07:10 -0500 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k03M77N01260; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:07:08 -0500 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k03M74Bk031908; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:07:04 -0500 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k03M6xWf031905; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:06:59 -0500 Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200601032206.k03M6xWf031905@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: nickc@redhat.com CC: cgen@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <43B16F58.5040502@redhat.com> (message from Nick Clifton on Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:44:08 +0000) Subject: Re: [cgen-ibld-dis] fill_cache vs variable sized opcodes References: <200512072213.jB7MDGMD015691@greed.delorie.com> <43B16F58.5040502@redhat.com> Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 > > * cgen-ibld.in (extract_normal): Avoid memory range errors. > > Approved - please apply. Done. Note that there's a second place where this logic is used (insert_normal), but I couldn't guarantee that the change was valid for that case, so I left it alone. That, and it hasn't bitten me yet ;-)