From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6748 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2012 21:04:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 6739 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jan 2012 21:04:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:04:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0JL4asq010490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:04:36 -0500 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-8-160.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.8.160]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0JL4ZP0017444; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:04:35 -0500 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id EFCA45815A; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:04:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:04:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: "Jose E. Marchesi" Cc: cgen@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Hi there Message-ID: <20120119210434.GC4174@redhat.com> References: <8739bbpkll.fsf@gnu.org> <20120119192019.GA4174@redhat.com> <87d3afmmp0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d3afmmp0.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q1/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 Hi - On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:01:15PM +0100, Jose E. Marchesi wrote: > [...] > Which simulator framework are you planning to use (gdb/sim vs. sid)? > > gdb. I am still in the stage on getting familiar with the common sim > infrastructure, but it looks like it provides enough flexibility (in > terms of buses, signals, etc) for my purposes. OK. sid's flexibility may become needed if you want to model more peculiar hardware, like different cpus, unusual peripherals, but you'll know when/if you get there. > Besides, my company filed a copyright assignment for gdb, and I have got > a personal one in place as well :) OK. > BTW, do I need to sign separated papers for CGEN? What you have should be fine. We have lots of (C)FSF .cpu files in the /src/cpu repo. - FChE