From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 70914 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2016 17:45:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 70884 invoked by uid 89); 7 Jun 2016 17:45:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=fche, H*Ad:U*cgen X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 17:45:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63F4880F6B; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fche.csb (vpn-56-109.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.56.109]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u57Hj1jn011942; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 13:45:01 -0400 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id 4386558CBA; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 13:45:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 17:45:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Aurelien Buhrig Cc: cgen Subject: Re: sid semantic with derived-operands Message-ID: <20160607174504.GD28459@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-q2/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 Hi - On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:34:04AM +0200, Aurelien Buhrig wrote: > I have an issue when generating the sid semantic of derived-operands. > When printing C code for sid semantic, cgen tries to generate a > hardware index (in /gen-hw-index) from a derived ifield, which is not > supported by /gen-hw-index. > [...] Could you share a relevant usable extract of your .cpu file? Maybe there is a better way to express what you have in mind. - FChE