From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 41108 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2018 16:35:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 41089 invoked by uid 89); 29 Oct 2018 16:35:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:35:06 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id w9TGYdl9015113; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:34:39 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id w9TGYWrW015105; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:34:32 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:35:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Stafford Horne Cc: Richard Henderson , GCC patches , Openrisc , Jeff Law , Joseph Myers , Joel Sherrill , Sebastian Huber , cgen@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] or1k: gcc: initial support for openrisc Message-ID: <20181029163426.GM5766@gate.crashing.org> References: <20181027043702.18414-1-shorne@gmail.com> <20181027043702.18414-4-shorne@gmail.com> <20181028025730.GH5766@gate.crashing.org> <20181029133425.GE1761@lianli.shorne-pla.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181029133425.GE1761@lianli.shorne-pla.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-SW-Source: 2018-q4/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:34:25PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 11:16:13PM +0000, Richard Henderson wrote: > > On 10/28/18 2:57 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > Is this correct? Should this be unsigned (u16 and K)? > > > > No, l.xori is signed. > > Right, sorry, I didn't have enough time to look at this at all this morning. It > is correct. > > It looks like the documentation for this page [1] is generated from the cgen cpu > descriptions that were removed from binutils-gdb back in 2014. Ccing cgen who > seem to maintain this web page. How can we go about getting it regenerated? Is there some better documentation available? This is what google found for me. I would have like better docs (more compact, etc.) Links to such would be great to have in readings.html :-) Segher