From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16331 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2019 21:54:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16321 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jun 2019 21:54:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=wishes, HX-Languages-Length:350, executive X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:54:49 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F30747FDFA; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-116-49.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.49]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4A5460160; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fche by redhat.com with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hbBCg-0000PG-D2; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 17:54:46 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:54:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Stafford Horne Cc: cgen@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] CGEN unordered fpu compares + fixes Message-ID: <20190612215446.GA32764@redhat.com> References: <20190601072629.4070-1-shorne@gmail.com> <20190612131403.GE2358@lianli.shorne-pla.net> <20190612150440.GA31262@redhat.com> <20190612205331.GG2358@lianli.shorne-pla.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190612205331.GG2358@lianli.shorne-pla.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-q2/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 Hi - > Or did we stop maintaining the change log when moving to git (I would have no > problem with that myself ;) )? I'm not sure who is in a position to make an executive decision in the matter. I'm for it myself. Is there someone who wishes to speak up in defense of ChangeLog files? - FChE