From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: matthew green <mrg@cygnus.com>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: cgen@sources.redhat.com
Subject: re: generalizing the delay rtx function 
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 23:40:00 -0000
Message-id: <20859.984555605@cygnus.com>
References: <20010308160106.A28162@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg00158.html

   
   - Provide a clear definition for the DELAY rtx:
     The numeric argument is the number of instruction cycles
     after the current one, at which the enclosed set expressions
     take effect.

is this possible?  eg, (sparc) if i do:

	ba	foo
	 ld	[%l1 + 4], %o0

vs.

	ba	foo
	 tst	%o0

the load can take *much* longer than the tst?


other than that, i think this looks fine.



.mrg