From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Brolley To: cgen@sources.redhat.com Subject: CGEN: RELAXABLE and RELAX Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 09:04:00 -0000 Message-id: <399D5EC7.C59F3DEF@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q3/msg00046.html Hi, The architecture I'm working with has two load immediate insns that look syntactically identical except for the range of the immediate value allowed: ld Rn,imm8 ; 8 bit immediate ld Rn,imm16 ; 16 bit immediate The 8 bit load assembles to a 16 bit insn and the 16 bit load assembles to a 32 bit insn. From the reading the CGEN manual, it looks to me like this is what RELAXABLE and RELAX are supposed to handle. i.e. specifying RELAXABLE on the 8 bit load will cause it to be tried first during assembly and specifying RELAX on the 16 bit load will cause it to be tried next. I tried this, but when I code 'ld r1,0x100', I get an error saying bad instruction. 'ld r1,0xff' assembles correctly. It looks like the 16 bit load was never considered. Am I missing something? Thanks, Dave