From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9398 invoked by alias); 22 May 2002 18:46:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9376 invoked from network); 22 May 2002 18:46:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 May 2002 18:46:11 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (unknown [172.16.14.115]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8443B8036 for ; Wed, 22 May 2002 14:46:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CEBE777.705@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 11:46:00 -0000 From: Dave Brolley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cgen@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch][rfa] Decoder bit underflow References: <3CEBDEF9.70206@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-q2/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 Committed -- Approved by fche and bje. Dave Brolley wrote: > Hi, > > The attached patch addresses a situation which can occur on ports > which define insns that are shorter than base-insn-bitsize and are > defined with lsb0?==false. When decoding such an insn it is possible > for a bit beyond the length of the insn to be considered for decoding. > This patch tests for that situation and does not consider the bit in > that case.