From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cgen-return-1817-listarch-cgen=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 3802 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2005 07:54:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cgen-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cgen/>
List-Post: <mailto:cgen@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cgen-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 3757 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Oct 2005 07:54:26 -0000
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:54:26 +0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9I7sOZm001675;
	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 03:54:24 -0400
Received: from pobox.surrey.redhat.com (pobox.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.17])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j9I7sNV04307;
	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 03:54:23 -0400
Received: from [172.31.0.98] (vpn-68-2.surrey.redhat.com [10.32.68.2])
	by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j9I7sLNd011152;
	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:54:22 +0100
Message-ID: <4354AA4B.3060704@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:54:00 -0000
From: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kazuhiro Inaoka <inaoka.kazuhiro@renesas.com>
CC: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, binutils@sources.redhat.com,
        cgen@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m32r-*-as  For a code depended for host word size.
References: <434F6596.404@renesas.com> <je4q7ko4g3.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <4352FC6C.3070703@renesas.com>
In-Reply-To: <4352FC6C.3070703@renesas.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2005-q4/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2

Hi Kazuhiro,

> Thanks  Andreas,

>>           value = ((value & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000.

> It's better code.

> Hi Nick,
> Should I make and send the patch again?

No need - I have checked this patch in and attributed it to Andreas.

Cheers
   Nick