From: Doug Evans <dje@sebabeach.org>
To: cgen@sourceware.org
Subject: adding looping construct to rtl?
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A3BDE92.4010504@sebabeach.org> (raw)
Hi.
Does anyone have any thoughts on adding a looping construct to the RTL?
This could be used, e.g., to simplify things like ARM's
load/store-multiple instructions.
The first thing that came to mind is named sequences, akin to named
lets. It's kinda nice, but maybe a bit too esoteric for the target
audience. How to extend `sequence' is another matter, creating a new
name may be the simpler way to go.
reply other threads:[~2009-06-19 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A3BDE92.4010504@sebabeach.org \
--to=dje@sebabeach.org \
--cc=cgen@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).