From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19696 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2009 16:07:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 19669 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jul 2009 16:07:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX,J_CHICKENPOX_22 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sebabeach.org (HELO sebabeach.org) (64.165.110.50) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:07:45 +0000 Received: from sspiff.sspiff.org (seba.sebabeach.org [10.8.159.10]) by sebabeach.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425616E3CE; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:07:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A5A0A4F.2030808@sebabeach.org> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:07:00 -0000 From: Doug Evans User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Brolley CC: fche@redhat.com, cgen@sourceware.org Subject: Re: remove dups from cgen/cpu? References: <20090709160851.B60D36E3D1@sebabeach.org> <4A5622C8.2090601@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4A5622C8.2090601@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 Dave Brolley wrote: > I have no objections to the removal of duplicates. Although it has > been explained to me several times, I keep forgetting why we needed > src/cpu vs src/cgen/cpu at all. They're source code that go into building the programs and we don't ship src/cgen with binutils, et.al. >> [Some files, e.g. sh*, have signficant differences. >> I was going to leave resolving those for another pass, >> and just do the ones with no or simple differences first.] >> > Wrt sh, the work in src/cpu is most up to date. Thanks.