From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cgen-return-2346-listarch-cgen=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22149 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2009 01:59:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 21742 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Aug 2009 01:59:42 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (HELO ey-out-1920.google.com) (74.125.78.149)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 01:59:34 +0000
Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so99940eyg.0         for <cgen@sourceware.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.210.135.7 with SMTP id i7mr2115547ebd.6.1251424771742;         Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.2.99? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62])         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm984702eye.4.2009.08.27.18.59.30         (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);         Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A973D3A.3010703@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 01:59:00 -0000
From: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Doug Evans <dje@sebabeach.org>
CC: cgen@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: new do-count rtl
References: <4A95669B.8050900@sebabeach.org> <4A96FC2B.8010605@sebabeach.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A96FC2B.8010605@sebabeach.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cgen.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cgen-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cgen/>
List-Post: <mailto:cgen@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cgen-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cgen-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2

Doug Evans wrote:
> Doug Evans wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> What do folks think of adding a new rtl for iterating a specified
>> number of times.
>>
>> Something like
>>
>> (do-count nr-times iter-var expr1 [expr2 ...])
>>
>> For now the result would always be void, and iter-var would always
>> have mode INT.
>> The set of expressions is performed nr-times times and iter-var has
>> values 0 ... nr-times - 1.
>>
>> ?
>>
> 
> Checked in.

  I don't speak scheme or guile, but I'm learning, so forgive me in advance if
this is a dumb question:  Does this differ from using a .map on an .iota when
generating a parameter to an rtl s-expr?

    cheers,
      DaveK