From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2656 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2009 18:04:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 2374 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Dec 2009 18:04:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sebabeach.org (HELO sebabeach.org) (64.165.110.50) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:04:02 +0000 Received: from sspiff.sspiff.org (seba.sebabeach.org [10.8.159.10]) by sebabeach.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E396E3CE; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:04:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B155A90.9080705@sebabeach.org> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:04:00 -0000 From: Doug Evans User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Korn CC: cgen@sourceware.org Subject: Re: CGEN_VERBOSE_ASSEMBLER_ERRORS References: <20091201090929.6F4FF6E3D9@sebabeach.org> <4B155D6F.8060103@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B155D6F.8060103@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2 Dave Korn wrote: > Doug Evans wrote: > >> Anyone know of a reason why we shouldn't just nuke >> CGEN_VERBOSE_ASSEMBLER_ERRORS and always have verbose error messages? >> > > Might conceivably cause some minor perturbation in the gas testsuite for any > target that doesn't currently define it and that has tests of error cases, but > nothing that can't be easily fixed. Maybe it would be worth pinging the > binutils list? > > cheers, > DaveK > Hi. I'm not worried about breaking the testsuites. Those things I can find and fix before checkin. I'm just wondering why it exists at all (basically). [Other than laziness of updating the testsuites when it was added. :-)]