From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cgen-return-2545-listarch-cgen=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21104 invoked by alias); 30 May 2012 09:41:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 20987 invoked by uid 22791); 30 May 2012 09:41:31 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-ee0-f41.google.com) (74.125.83.41)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 May 2012 09:41:18 +0000
Received: by eekb47 with SMTP id b47so1559853eek.0        for <cgen@sourceware.org>; Wed, 30 May 2012 02:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.97.134 with SMTP id t6mr5664161eef.121.1338370876957;        Wed, 30 May 2012 02:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.15.38.164] (LCaen-156-54-3-113.w80-11.abo.wanadoo.fr. [80.11.66.113])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p41sm30426484eef.5.2012.05.30.02.41.15        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);        Wed, 30 May 2012 02:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FC5EB3A.7020609@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 09:41:00 -0000
From: Aurelien Buhrig <aurelien.buhrig.gcc@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cgen@sourceware.org
Subject: multi-ifield issue
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cgen.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cgen-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cgen/>
List-Post: <mailto:cgen@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cgen-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cgen-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-q2/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2

Hi,

I think there is a bug when defining an instruction with a multi-ifield
in its format.

I defined :
(dnf  f-0       "bit 0"         ()      0       1)
(dnf  f-5       "bit 5"         ()      5       1)
(dsmf f-05      "bit 0 & 5"     ()      (f-0 f-5))


And when I define an insn with the following format:
(+ (f-05 0) F_MISC F_ADOP ADA_RA sreg dreg)

I get :
Performing sanity checks ...
ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 2: 3
No backtrace available.

Everything works fine if I define:
(+ (f-0 0) (f-5 0) F_MISC F_ADOP ADA_RA sreg dreg)

I'm not a scheme expert and was not able to figure out what's wrong...


Cheers,
Aurélien