Re: [PATCH] sim/microblaze/interp.c: Use long int format instead of int to avoid compiling warnings

[Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>]

On 07/01/2014 08:43 AM, Michael Eager wrote:
> On 06/30/14 17:14, Chen Gang wrote:
>> The related warnings (cross compile microblaze-linux-elf):
>>
>>    ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c: In function
>> ‘microblaze_extract_unsigned_integer’:
>>    ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c:53:6: warning: format
>> ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long
>> unsigned int’ [-Wformat]
>>    ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c: In function ‘sim_size’:
>>    ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c:329:4: warning:
>> format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 3 has type
>> ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat]
>>    ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c: In function
>> ‘set_initial_gprs’:
>>    ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c:360:7: warning:
>> format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 3 has type
>> ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat]
>>    ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c:360:7: warning:
>> format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 4
>> has type ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat]
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   sim/ChangeLog           | 5 +++++
>>   sim/microblaze/interp.c | 6 +++---
>>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sim/ChangeLog b/sim/ChangeLog
>> index 35d0920..03c244b 100644
>> --- a/sim/ChangeLog
>> +++ b/sim/ChangeLog
>> @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
>> +2014-07-01  Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
>> +
>> +    * sim/microblaze/interp.c: Use long int format instead of int
>> +    format to avoid compiling warnings.
>> +
>>   2014-03-12  Nick Clifton  <nickc@redhat.com>
>>
>>       * MAINTAINERS: Add myself as the maintainer for the MSP430.
> 
> Please put your ChangeLog in the email, not in a patch.

OK, thanks. I shall notice about it next time. If necessary to send
patch v2 for it, please let me know.

> 
>> diff --git a/sim/microblaze/interp.c b/sim/microblaze/interp.c
>> index cc61278..e92a1d0 100644
>> --- a/sim/microblaze/interp.c
>> +++ b/sim/microblaze/interp.c
>> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ microblaze_extract_unsigned_integer (unsigned char
>> *addr, int len)
>>
>>     if (len > (int) sizeof (unsigned long))
>>       printf ("That operation is not available on integers of more than "
>> -        "%d bytes.", sizeof (unsigned long));
>> +        "%ld bytes.", sizeof (unsigned long));
>>
>>     /* Start at the most significant end of the integer, and work towards
>>        the least significant.  */
>> @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ sim_size (int size)
>>       {
>>         if (issue_messages)
>>       fprintf (stderr,
>> -         "Not enough VM for simulation of %d bytes of RAM\n",
>> +         "Not enough VM for simulation of %ld bytes of RAM\n",
>>            CPU.msize);
>>
>>         CPU.msize = 1;
>> @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ set_initial_gprs ()
>>     memsize = CPU.msize / (1024 * 1024);
>>
>>     if (issue_messages > 1)
>> -    fprintf (stderr, "Simulated memory of %d Mbytes (0x0 .. 0x%08x)\n",
>> +    fprintf (stderr, "Simulated memory of %ld Mbytes (0x0 ..
>> 0x%08lx)\n",
>>            memsize, CPU.msize - 1);
>>
>>     /* Clean out the GPRs */
> 
> 
> Commit ba8e7d1e2.

Excuse me, I do not quite undersand the meaning. I guess it means:

   "have applied this patch, and its' commit number is ba8e7d1e2...",

If what I guess is incorrect, please let me know, and I shall send patch
v2 for it.


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang

Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed