From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 78371 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2019 16:30:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 78339 invoked by uid 89); 3 Feb 2019 16:30:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=straight, sufficient X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 16:30:02 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9582C04BD2F; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 16:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-116-33.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.33]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 935C75D9CD; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 16:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=vm-rhel7) by redhat.com with esmtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gqKec-0005MA-UN; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 11:29:59 -0500 From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) To: Andrew Burgess Cc: cgen@sourceware.org, nickc@redhat.com Subject: Re: Converting CGEN from CVS to git References: <20190131195017.GB17699@embecosm.com> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 16:30:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20190131195017.GB17699@embecosm.com> (Andrew Burgess's message of "Thu, 31 Jan 2019 19:50:17 +0000") Message-ID: <878sywvnqx.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-q1/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 andrew.burgess wrote: > I would like to discuss the idea of converting CGEN from CVS to git. No objections here, glad to see someone is still interested! Agreed that old branches are disposable, that a straight main branch cvs-to-git conversion is sufficient. Any objections to just doing it? It could be nice if someone (tm) were to pursue merging cgen into binutils proper, but that is a separate issue. - FChE