From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64DB53858C39 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 02:36:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 64DB53858C39 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOWP5-0003yp-0c for cgen@sourceware.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 22:36:35 -0400 Received: from [141.143.193.79] (port=13796 helo=termi.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOWP4-0006HO-PO for cgen@sourceware.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 22:36:34 -0400 From: "Jose E. Marchesi" To: "Jose E. Marchesi via Cgen" Subject: Re: [PATCH CGEN v1] cgen: Compute correct mask and values when offset in define-ifield is not 0. References: <20210820023254.2575757-1-guillermo.e.martinez@oracle.com> <7123187.iIbC2pHGDl@sali> <20210910012321.GA19490@redhat.com> <87y28540yn.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 04:36:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y28540yn.fsf@gnu.org> (Jose E. Marchesi via Cgen's message of "Fri, 10 Sep 2021 04:29:52 +0200") Message-ID: <87bl5140nk.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cgen@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cgen mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 02:36:36 -0000 >>> Just to know if you have some comments to this patch :-) >>> Thanks in advance. >> >> Sorry, no fresh enough knowledge to offer informed commentary. If >> your regression tests on other platform indicated no problems, and >> it solves a real problem with your arch, go for it. > > FWIW we reviewed carefully the change internally and it looks good to > me... ... and of course if we break it, we fix it ;) /me crosses fingers and toes and...