From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cgen-return-1425-listarch-cgen=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 29811 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2003 00:50:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cgen-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cgen/>
List-Post: <mailto:cgen@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cgen-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 29803 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2003 00:50:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Jul 2003 00:50:36 -0000
Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19XVoz-00057q-00
	for <cgen@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 02 Jul 2003 02:50:05 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cgen@sources.redhat.com
Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19XVlF-0004vB-00
	for <gmane-comp-tools-cgen-devel@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 02 Jul 2003 02:46:13 +0200
From: Ben Elliston <bje@wasabisystems.com>
Subject: Re: fix for arm file generation, check in now, or later?
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:50:00 -0000
Message-ID: <87fzm62y2b.fsf@sashimi.wasabisystems.com>
References: <20030619191934.E160DB536@mail.sebabeach.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2

Doug Evans <dje@sebabeach.org> writes:

> The catch is that it exposes a slowness in the current
> implementation.  It's one that eventually needs to be changed anyway
> and has always been anticipated: objects are recorded on lists so
> searching is slow.

This will go away if we switch to using Guile's object system, yes?

> I'm inclined to get this in and leave the speedup for another day.

I agree.

Ben