From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B0EC3857C47 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 21:10:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0B0EC3857C47 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40332) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQFhQ-0001gl-B6; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:10:40 -0400 Received: from [141.143.193.79] (port=23364 helo=termi.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQFhQ-0002Be-3M; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:10:40 -0400 From: "Jose E. Marchesi" To: "Jose E. Marchesi" Cc: cgen@sourceware.org Subject: Re: updating ChangeLog policy to match binutils/gdb? References: <87mtr83at2.fsf@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 23:10:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Mike Frysinger via Cgen's message of "Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:36:51 -0400") Message-ID: <87o88uvp6c.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cgen@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cgen mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 21:10:42 -0000 > On 29 Jun 2021 18:17, Jose E. Marchesi via Cgen wrote: >> > the binutils & gdb projects are changing their ChangeLog policy: they won't >> > be required anywhere, but people need to write detailed commit messages. >> > can we update cgen to follow suit ? >> > >> > gdb: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-June/179872.html >> > binutils: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-June/117016.html >> >> I wouldn't object to such a change. >> >> (I will continue including ChangeLog entries in commit messages >> anyway... after so many years I would feel "naked" without them ;)) > > just want to double check before i start doing this ... it's OK if i omit > ChangeLog entries now ? If Frank doesn't object, I think it makes sense to follow what binutils and GDB do, i.e. no ChangeLog entries required.