From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cgen-return-1351-listarch-cgen=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 32317 invoked by alias); 21 May 2003 03:58:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cgen-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cgen/>
List-Post: <mailto:cgen@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cgen-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 32289 invoked from network); 21 May 2003 03:58:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 May 2003 03:58:22 -0000
Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19IKiL-0004me-00
	for <cgen@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 21 May 2003 05:56:29 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cgen@sources.redhat.com
Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19IKiJ-0004mV-00
	for <gmane-comp-tools-cgen-devel@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 21 May 2003 05:56:27 +0200
From: Ben Elliston <bje@wasabisystems.com>
Subject: Re: 1.1?
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 03:58:00 -0000
Message-ID: <87u1bpuf0w.fsf@sashimi.wasabisystems.com>
References: <20030521031749.68267B536@mail.sebabeach.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2

Doug Evans <dje@sebabeach.org> writes:

> I have almost completed patches to upgrade cgen to guile 1.6.4
> (setting aside switching from cos to goops, later).

How much code do you think switching to GOOPS will shed?  Presumably
lots?

> After that, is there anything else we'd want in a 1.1 release?

Sounds good.  A release has been needed for a while.

Ben