From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FA33858D28 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:55:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 48FA33858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYXSy-0003BT-JH; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 15:55:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=UxVCMN6C4q1CxWcOR9f+VWF+faBucKuJa+eCh8CdntQ=; b=EcmgzmFDGi0MLpi+ymX4 l4u4Z7H1pa7O/u8JaQJpYCH6goufBcGyNxU3x0vGHLiVibBpXzk4TzcKP2scufhJ/Zok2Or1L4K0t HlRDotiFE7ooPWpCzwyAgCxNdqpk1SFRakPMFVBzqcPjEd7E9WfWypeWVqIwAacxUYJL0xVQMh0xI cJWTnLrrQxm2D1OyK7G5MuZkyOECRe18c7Ox50eoLwu1inOQ5+z+F7xOQxapCnO6LWgb9RaXmiRtc aMgmd4mtiCqqbO2EzR3Rturqmhvzrp0DPpcbQyKBDl+x3fJl3DshJ6u5B4/vxiygJUL77WAXHmU1V At3pNZlxUiAoqA==; From: "Jose E. Marchesi" To: Tom Tromey Cc: cgen@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable the Guile compiler In-Reply-To: <87a5uivp5q.fsf@tromey.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Tue, 22 Aug 2023 13:43:29 -0600") References: <20230822185153.1291550-1-tom@tromey.com> <875y56gapx.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5uivp5q.fsf@tromey.com> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 21:54:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87wmxmett9.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > Jose> Does this work with the current way binutils Makefiles use to invoke > Jose> cgen, or it needs an accompanying binutils patch? > > Yes, though I have a patch to somewhat simplify that as well. > > This patch also seems to make things work fine with Guile 2.2. > > Worth noting that the compiler speeds things up quite a bit, and Guile > 3.0 seems to be even faster than 2.2. So, it's worth using that if you > can. Awesome :) OK, thanks!