From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25903 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2003 04:25:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25891 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2003 04:25:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO namadgi.wasabisystems.com) (203.51.30.160) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Oct 2003 04:25:06 -0000 Received: by namadgi.wasabisystems.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F2ED21EB7B; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:25:04 +1100 (EST) To: Ralph Escherich Cc: cgen@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: binutils porting to new CPU References: <20031029165027.GA30779@redhat.com> <200310292147.31532.esche@mobilesmartsinc.com> <87ad7ji5st.fsf@wasabisystems.com> <200310300848.55978.esche@mobilesmartsinc.com> From: Ben Elliston Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 04:25:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200310300848.55978.esche@mobilesmartsinc.com> Message-ID: <87wuamghjz.fsf@wasabisystems.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-q4/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 Ralph Escherich writes: > No, I'm using binutils-2.14. For cgen I'm using the latest CVS snap. > I couldn't get the scheme code going with release 1.0. You should use CVS binutils if you're using CVS cgen. > Which CPU port would be an easy one to get started with? fr30 is probably a nice case. Ben