From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cgen-return-2596-listarch-cgen=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14299 invoked by alias); 22 May 2014 14:10:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cgen.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cgen-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cgen/>
List-Post: <mailto:cgen@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cgen-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cgen-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 14283 invoked by uid 89); 22 May 2014 14:10:08 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: mail-oa0-f53.google.com
Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com (HELO mail-oa0-f53.google.com) (209.85.219.53) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 22 May 2014 14:10:05 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id m1so3932470oag.26        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 22 May 2014 07:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.51.136 with SMTP id k8mr58818745oeo.33.1400767803127; Thu, 22 May 2014 07:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.31.65 with HTTP; Thu, 22 May 2014 07:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5561926758764771034@unknownmsgid>
References: <20140522052921.GA30609@chokladfabriken.org>	<alpine.DEB.1.10.1405220702380.512@tp.orcam.me.uk>	<CADzBsGObK_dNY81Lcv8HgPAP800xv2H8vf80M96-NfMo-CXcPA@mail.gmail.com>	<20140522071001.GA30918@chokladfabriken.org>	<5561926758764771034@unknownmsgid>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 14:10:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADzBsGN-T1dMgp1DpBb6ysBW+wQyLjY6-7GLuCgKkcUUJTkmtw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make large enum constants unsigned
From: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>
To: Pierre Muller <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>, 	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>, cgen@sourceware.org, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>, 	fche@sourceware.org, Christian Svensson <blue@cmd.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2014-q2/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Pierre Muller
<pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> wrote:
>   Couldn't we support 64-bit constants already,
> by adding
> +                                                      (if (> (cadr e)
> +                                                             #x100000000)
> +                                                          "LL" ""))
> Right after the conditional "U" postfix?
>
> This way, the pre C-99 standard would only be violated when
> it is really required anyhow, no?
>

That would solve the standard violation problem, but the fact that
enums are limited to the size of an int still remains, so it wouldn't
help much.

Stefan