From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24697 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2002 16:48:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24683 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2002 16:48:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.trouble.net) (212.37.0.80) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2002 16:48:04 -0000 Received: by mail.trouble.net (Postfix, from userid 550) id 2B7504ACB5; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 17:48:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.trouble.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE262286F; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 17:48:01 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 08:48:00 -0000 From: Johan Rydberg X-X-Sender: To: Cc: Subject: make CGEN a less moving target? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-q4/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2 Hi fellow CGEN-hackers. >From what I've seen it seems that CGEN have matured to the point where it maybe is time to write a list of what should be included in a CPU description, and where. Maybe list all keywords and such. The reason for this is that maybe someone would like to write a parser for .cpu-files, and not use the Scheme-sources provided by Red Hat, Inc. (define-insn ...) and similar seems pretty "stable", but there seem to be a lot of confusion regarding the (define-isa ...) fields. brgds, johan