From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com>
To: Johan Rydberg <johan.rydberg@netinsight.se>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>, <cgen@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: enums
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 03:35:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012062234210.12267-100000@moshpit.cygnus.com>
References: <3A2E21F0.A5A0C5FE@netinsight.se>
X-SW-Source: 2000-q4/msg00238.html

   > :    (values ("RESET") ("BUSERR" -) ("DPF" -) ("IPF" -)
   > :            ("EXTINT" -) ("ALIGN" -) ("ILLEGAL" -) ("PEINT" -)
   > :            ("DTLBMISS" -) ("ITLBMISS" -) ("RRANGE" -)
   > :            ("SYSCALL" -) ("BREAK" -) ("RESERVED" -))

   > Is this intentional?  Why define the others with value "-" ?

   Well, first i defined it like: ("RESET" #x100) ("BUFFER" #x200) And
   that didn't work at all.  All the "-" values is just the result of a
   search-and-replace.

In other contexts, an enum value can be:

	(values "RESET" "BUSERR" "DPF" ..)

Does that work?

Ben