From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28013 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2009 14:54:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 28000 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2009 14:54:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:54:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n58EsJ17030921; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:54:19 -0400 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-10-122.bos.redhat.com [10.16.10.122]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n58EsIXl010312; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:54:18 -0400 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id 42A8058411; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:54:18 -0400 (EDT) To: Doug Evans Cc: cgen@sourceware.org Subject: Re: stop assuming cgen is scripted? References: <200906051304.n55D4xAr025352@localhost.localdomain> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200906051304.n55D4xAr025352@localhost.localdomain> (Doug Evans's message of "Fri, 5 Jun 2009 06:04:59 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q2/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 Doug Evans writes: > One thing I would like to change in cgen is the assumption that it's > scripted. It originally didn't assume it was scripted. How much > resistance is there to removing this assumption? Can you elaborate what this would entail in terms of code? We're unlikely to have strong opinions in this regard; hobbit support was only reluctantly removed because of interoperability problems with guile, IIRC. But I think we're all just happy to see you back actively on the project. - FChE