public inbox for crossgcc@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zinosat@gmail.com
To: David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>, crossgcc@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Compiling for old system
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 23:50:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <07cf0e43ccea853fa97429dfd5846a65235c2212.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8e0868c-5092-14de-6751-9e85f3bf48c9@hesbynett.no>

On Fri, 2021-05-28 at 18:56 +0200, David Brown wrote:
> On 27/05/2021 23:03, Davide Viti via crossgcc wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm trying to create a toolchain targeting an old powerpc system
> > running
> > kernel 2.6.18 and libc 2.5. The toolchain has to be used on a
> > windows
> > machine.
> > 
> > I've tried different combinations on Linux and ctng 1.5.2 fits all
> > my needs.
> > I've then tried to build the same on Windows, using cygwin, but
> > compilation
> > fails at "Installing shared core C compiler" [1]
> > The config is available at [2]
> > 
> > The compilation process on cygwin is extremely slow: I've managed
> > to enable
> > the experimental feature and restart the build from the last
> > failure, but
> > it still i very slow, especially if compared with Linux builds:
> > I've tried
> > to do a canadian cross, but it's too much for my newbie skills: if
> > anyone
> > would be willing to give me some advices, It'd be great to do that!
> > 
> > thank you in advance
> > 
> > Davide
> > 
> > [1] https://pastebin.com/BBrFVt4e
> > [2] https://pastebin.com/jJmMzm9m
> 
> As an alternative to Cygwin, you could try msys2 / mingw-64.  My
> experience is that this can often be a lot faster than Cygwin, and
> creates stand-alone programs that feel less "alien" in Windows.
> However, it has limitations if you need more accurate POSIX
> emulation,
> such as for fork() calls.  It's worth trying.
> 
> You could also install VirtualBox and run the Linux system within a
> virtual machine, on the Windows host, if you can't escape from using
> Windows on the actual PC.
> 

Windows, unfortunately, is not an option (I'd happily avoid tyo use
it). 
msys2 / mingw-64 could be an option: I've more experience with cygwin,
so I've chosen this solution. Another reaso for choosing cygin is that
I could use an older version which made it possible to build old 1.5.2
crosstool: I don't know if there's an equivalent "time macine" for
msys2 / mingw-64.

My hope, now, is that there's a known fix for the error I stumbled into

thank you
Davide


      reply	other threads:[~2021-05-28 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-27 21:03 Davide Viti
2021-05-28 15:18 ` Thomas Fuller
2021-05-28 16:33   ` Bottom Post
2021-05-28 21:44     ` zinosat
2021-05-28 16:56 ` David Brown
2021-05-28 21:50   ` zinosat [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=07cf0e43ccea853fa97429dfd5846a65235c2212.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=zinosat@gmail.com \
    --cc=crossgcc@sourceware.org \
    --cc=david.brown@hesbynett.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).