From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21053 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2017 21:49:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact crossgcc-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21040 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jan 2017 21:49:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=zv, ZV, industries, addressee X-HELO: mx1.elta.co.il Received: from mx1.elta.co.il (HELO mx1.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 21:49:01 +0000 Received: from mailrelay.elta.co.il (Unknown_Domain [172.16.0.52]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.elta.co.il (;-)) with SMTP id E9.49.41156.74C1C685; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 23:48:58 +0200 (IST) Received: from eltidex2.elta.co.il ([fe80::15bc:5498:6e1b:bc2]) by eltihex1.elta.co.il ([fe80::8c04:5572:2959:566b%14]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 23:48:54 +0200 From: Vered Zvi To: "crossgcc@sourceware.org" Subject: ldd for busybox compiled for arm Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 21:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1EFFBDE6584C794F8A0ADF2CAC8D60E09F909C3C@eltidex2.elta.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-01/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 Hello, Using crosstool-ng 1.22.0 I created a toolchain for: arm-cortex_a15-linux-= gnueabi The host is Centos 7.2.1511 (64) Using this toolchain I compiled busybox. make ARCH=3Darm CROSS_COMPILE=3D../../../../toolchain/crosstool/release/bin= /arm-cortex_a15-linux-gnueabihf- defconfig make ARCH=3Darm CROSS_COMPILE=3D../../../../toolchain/crosstool/release/bin= /arm-cortex_a15-linux-gnueabihf- Is it possible to use ldd from this toolchain to find out the dependencies = for /bin/sh , /sbin/init ? Strange: both /bin/sh, /sbin/init run under x86. How it is possible ? They were compiled for ARM. Thank you, Z.V The information contained in this communication is proprietary to Israel Ae= rospace Industries Ltd. and/or third parties, may contain confidential or p= rivileged information, and is intended only for the use of the intended add= ressee thereof. If you are not the intended addressee, please be aware that= any use, disclosure, distribution and/or copying of this communication is = strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please not= ify the sender immediately and delete it from your computer.