From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1436 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2009 16:06:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 1182 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Sep 2009 16:06:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp28.orange.fr (HELO smtp28.orange.fr) (80.12.242.101) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:06:20 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2822.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D6F6E7000085; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:06:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2822.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id CA327700009D; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:06:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r-lnx-leminkainen.bzh.lan (ARennes-252-1-23-141.w83-195.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.195.156.141]) by mwinf2822.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AF6537000085; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:06:17 +0200 (CEST) From: "Yann E. MORIN" To: Godmar Back Subject: Re: ct-ng build fails with 'make[1]: *** [configure-binutils] Error 1' Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:06:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: crossgcc@sourceware.org References: <719dced30909032047j74b8ca79pdb8a9de31ea5ac7@mail.gmail.com> <200909061539.44136.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> <719dced30909070704w7dc0317bm1b6b59aba90fc0ca@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <719dced30909070704w7dc0317bm1b6b59aba90fc0ca@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909071806.17281.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact crossgcc-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 Godmar, All, On Monday 07 September 2009 16:04:32 Godmar Back wrote: > It's explained there; still, it's not intuitive. I don't usually read > "Help" entries unless I think the label given to the option applies to > me. Perhaps make the label more informative to make clear that the > options influence the ability to run on all kernels? I thought that "Minimum supported kernel version" was explicit enough. What would you suggest instead (keep it short)? Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +0/33 662376056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | --==< ^_^ >==-- `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | `------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq