From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5225 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2011 12:36:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 5122 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Dec 2011 12:35:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (HELO r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com) (217.108.152.42) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:35:46 +0000 Received: from r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id E115AFC4003; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:35:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F97FC4001; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:35:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:35:43 +0100 Received: from r-lnx-ilmarinen.localnet ([10.194.59.183]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:35:43 +0100 From: "Yann E. MORIN" To: crossgcc@sourceware.org Subject: Re: build failure in native gdb with crosstool-ng-1.13.1 on openSUSE 12.1 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:36:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/3.1.4-ilmarinen-nv; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Trevor Woerner References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201112121335.43024.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> Mailing-List: contact crossgcc-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 Trevor, All, On Monday 05 December 2011 23:36:42 Trevor Woerner wrote: [RE. the gdb issue] > >> Care to test the attached patch, please? > > I have tested the patch and it works as well as my manual tweak; > > native gdb now builds, but it still fails in the strip step. Could you test without the patch, but first setting the following before runninf ct-ng: export CONFIG_SITE= (yes, an empty string) For reference, see this thread: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2011-December/048287.html and the answer there: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2011-December/048391.html Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +0/33 662376056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ^ | | --==< O_o >==-- '------------.-------: X AGAINST | /e\ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | (*_*) | / \ HTML MAIL | """ conspiracy. | '------------------------------'-------'------------------'--------------------' -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq