From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5455 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2012 18:25:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 5440 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jan 2012 18:25:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp08.smtpout.orange.fr (HELO smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) (80.12.242.130) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:25:08 +0000 Received: from treguer.localnet ([90.32.112.232]) by mwinf5d15 with ME id R6R71i00N50tzZm036R7T2; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:25:07 +0100 From: "Yann E. MORIN" To: crossgcc@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Using crosstool-ng on OpenBSD Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:25:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/3.2.1-treguer; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Renaud Allard References: <4F1D11AA.6010602@allard.it> <201201231839.19008.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> <4F1D9DE0.9060208@allard.it> In-Reply-To: <4F1D9DE0.9060208@allard.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201231925.07143.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Mailing-List: contact crossgcc-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 Renaud, All, On Monday 23 January 2012 18:50:24 Renaud Allard wrote: > On 23/01/12 18:39, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > That's been fixed upstream by this changeset: > > http://crosstool-ng.org/hg/crosstool-ng/file/188d58cfe7cf/scripts/functions#l767 That was also available for download from the fixes directory: http://crosstool-ng.org/download/crosstool-ng/01-fixes/1.13.2/ > While somewhat patching ct-ng to make it build with the latest release, > I also noticed that flag -v is used in ln and cp, which is not supported > either on OpenBSD. AFAIK, there is unfortunately no replacement for that > flag. > Also "cp -a" is also used, which doesn't work either, but here there is > a trivial way to replace it, "cp -rp". I don't know of the implications > of using -rp instead or -a on non linux/BSD platforms. OK, -r is not even in POSIX, while -R is. Can you check that BSD's cp does handle the -pR combination? If so, I'll chamge it. -v missing is not too problematic either. Its only use is to make the progress bar rotate, so as to give the user some feedback that the process is not hung. If we remove it, the progress bar will hang for some time during very big copies, but if that's the price to pay... And no, BSD-likes are not the stuff I test on! ;-) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq