From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 606 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2012 14:47:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 598 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Mar 2012 14:47:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from bar.sig21.net (HELO bar.sig21.net) (80.81.252.164) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:47:01 +0000 Received: from p5ddc7ed3.dip.t-dialin.net ([93.220.126.211] helo=abc.local) by bar.sig21.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S5ecJ-00006d-St; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:46:57 +0100 Received: from js by abc.local with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1S5ecK-0007u8-Jw; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:46:56 +0100 Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:47:00 -0000 From: Johannes Stezenbach To: Michael Zintakis Cc: "Yann E. MORIN" , crossgcc@sourceware.org Subject: Re: crosstool-NG 1.14.0 is out Message-ID: <20120308144656.GA30302@sig21.net> References: <201202010100.49177.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> <4F575EAB.1030308@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F575EAB.1030308@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-21-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-21-Report: No, score=-2.9 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1,BAYES_00=-1.9 autolearn=ham X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact crossgcc-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 01:12:11PM +0000, Michael Zintakis wrote: > > 2. Due to compatibility issues, which I might bother you in > subsequent posts, I built a static toolchain (that is, > statically-linked -gcc/ld etc files). The file size I > am getting varies between 1MB and 2MB, which for statically-linked > files is quite normal, I think. That way, I take it, these > executables will be shielded from the host environment and won't > require *any* external dependencies, right? The libc from your build system might have a dependency on a minimal kernel version, so the statically built toolchain might not run on very old systems. Otherwise the static toolchain should be self-contained. Johannes -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq