From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15984 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2015 16:42:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact crossgcc-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 15972 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jul 2015 16:42:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.gentoo.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 16:42:46 +0000 Received: from vapier (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4875E340792; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 16:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 16:42:00 -0000 From: Mike Frysinger To: ANDY KENNEDY Cc: crossgcc@sourceware.org Subject: Re: mips 32 24kec eabi. . . Message-ID: <20150706164243.GG17734@vapier> Mail-Followup-To: ANDY KENNEDY , crossgcc@sourceware.org References: <20150706100707.GE17734@vapier> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VIFPKPeEU/ajvd6j" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 --VIFPKPeEU/ajvd6j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 532 On 06 Jul 2015 16:00, ANDY KENNEDY wrote: > It seems that we are required to use the eabi system calls at boot for > this processor. Is that real or have we fallen off into the weeds on > this? We are not (by far) mips experts. if you only need it for the boot loader (e.g. u-boot), then you don't want a linux/glibc toolchain. people use something like mips-elf (*) instead and that can either use newlib or forego the C library entirely. (*) i haven't done mips/eabi myself, so the exact tuple here might be different. -mike --VIFPKPeEU/ajvd6j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVmrADAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBcDgQAJz9Kvn7yTlBlUEMQXiJXwEn AgPYoTEx9PegjAjyr2qTcq/Qn6nKMirL5tKLf+J8ZAW0jXinRx1Qt1ihXLmx5mbT Z5GW2cs5vBg84paOwY09w8N1DTDDnUQHc4TrIAVg1+egRxKHRVqHQVTePc9Z71xH rAmQOXyt/Tu+YoF9Ig5ucjofvJUGDoy8xo3ILTbCej9MoeCAcVlI8MNdS9v106Ct fCod2MILTtwpfOVC1oewCJRW73XqYXmoRKS2wv9hC+WTxKGzAnJoiAmVQ472TjJR ItKfMGyBs6qE00nFVv7DIT21RdStysiY5ocy12t8U1vY64VJC3bHOnf0uEaVRA/N 8MOUDZVEXfdoDgeG1YLMYFPUA0YTjTGSd1UWA7GPGLbRAYzEdy5DjMNo4us1tvqA SUv8zWGLaExM0iGLCN7ITfIfoV1UmzdPbTfWFDy5ITovKLDkZvqj+IZterBtBoMy /z+4LYyHdWaIsLLf+lQHYScCrVC5VBnldcT9vO6h0csaE4LSuYbSM5bE8N7Vwnx8 k+lgMUkKxIBSc47m3l/+fW0IqrM5diwUF+A7MxvaAoVufkOohRmm2XXtPMBpxArN bwbz/f1SKmwjTA0CWbrow9q4eVXpHO4IqEfPh0UGv2nHMu2XxlO+Ev+kV7mZxgyp s7bhjh8rN6tB7qBtorPG =0+6A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VIFPKPeEU/ajvd6j--