public inbox for crossgcc@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ng@piments.com
To: Martin Guy <martinwguy@gmail.com>
Cc: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>,
	  crossgcc@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: crosstool-ng: cross compiler for -mach=arm4vt (Cirrus Logic   	EP93xx target)
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:57:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AAAC7CA.3050605@piments.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56d259a00909111233n6fc9e643pbed1fe850c220e07@mail.gmail.com>

Martin Guy wrote:
> On 9/9/09, H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com> wrote:
>>  >> I used arm920t instead of ep9312 but I believe ep9312 is just an alias.
>>  > for arm920t, yes. It also passes "armv4t+maverick" to the assembler
>> So with "arm920t" does the assembler work ok for the ep93xx or should it
>>  be "ep9312"?
> 
> Yes, arm920t is fine. Just pretend the maverick isn't there. :)
> You only need ep9312 if you include maverick assembler fragments or
> are using my fixed GCCs for Maverick
> http://martinwguy.co.uk/martin/crunch
> I got back to "no known bugs" in this stuff again three days ago, so
> if you have FP-intensive stuff to run it might be worth trying.
> 
>    M


Thanks for that link , and all your efforts to knock some sensible ARM 
code out of GCC . Kudos.

I see you're posting patch sets for 4.2 and 4.3. I recall you said 
somewhere that 4.2.x produced faster ARM code. Is that still your 
experience?

best regards, Peter.



--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-11 21:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-08 22:48 H Hartley Sweeten
2009-09-09 11:01 ` Martin Guy
2009-09-09 18:06   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-09-09 19:26     ` wino
2009-09-11 19:33     ` Martin Guy
2009-09-11 21:57       ` ng [this message]
2009-09-11 22:12         ` wino
2009-09-11 22:20         ` Martin Guy
2009-09-12 20:18           ` Khem Raj
2009-09-13 13:15             ` Martin Guy
2009-09-13 15:55               ` Khem Raj
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-08 20:42 H Hartley Sweeten
2009-09-08 21:17 ` Yann E. MORIN
2009-09-08 21:31   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2009-09-09  8:39 ` Steve Papacharalambous
2009-09-09 11:21   ` Martin Guy
2009-09-09 15:30     ` Steve Papacharalambous
2009-09-09 13:42 ` ng
2009-09-09 17:26   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-09-11 10:29     ` Martin Guy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AAAC7CA.3050605@piments.com \
    --to=ng@piments.com \
    --cc=crossgcc@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hartleys@visionengravers.com \
    --cc=martinwguy@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).