From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11785 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2009 22:12:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 11777 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Sep 2009 22:12:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from 27.mail-out.ovh.net (HELO 27.mail-out.ovh.net) (91.121.30.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:12:23 +0000 Received: (qmail 31013 invoked by uid 503); 12 Sep 2009 00:19:20 -0000 Received: from b9.ovh.net (HELO mail407.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 27.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 12 Sep 2009 00:19:20 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 11 Sep 2009 22:12:29 -0000 Received: from amontpellier-156-1-152-33.w90-15.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO ?192.168.1.55?) (piments%piments.com@90.15.79.33) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 11 Sep 2009 22:12:28 -0000 Message-ID: <4AAACB3E.1010006@piments.com> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:12:00 -0000 From: wino User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Guy CC: H Hartley Sweeten , crossgcc@sourceware.org Subject: Re: crosstool-ng: cross compiler for -mach=arm4vt (Cirrus Logic EP93xx target) References: <56d259a00909090401i42a852e4g3764219d8a597ae5@mail.gmail.com> <56d259a00909111233n6fc9e643pbed1fe850c220e07@mail.gmail.com> <4AAAC7CA.3050605@piments.com> In-Reply-To: <4AAAC7CA.3050605@piments.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 14649083687999662703 X-Ovh-Remote: 90.15.79.33 (amontpellier-156-1-152-33.w90-15.abo.wanadoo.fr) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) Mailing-List: contact crossgcc-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 ng@piments.com wrote: > Thanks for that link , and all your efforts to knock some sensible ARM > code out of GCC . Kudos. > > I see you're posting patch sets for 4.2 and 4.3. I recall you said > somewhere that 4.2.x produced faster ARM code. Is that still your > experience? > > best regards, Peter. > Sorry , this is fully covered in the link. thx -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq