From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7174 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2010 22:21:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 7166 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jan 2010 22:21:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from vmlinux.org (HELO vmlinux.org) (193.41.214.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:21:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vmlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA971DDA9F3; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:21:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from vmlinux.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vmlinux.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TDBcPwaTAowT; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:21:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.124] (90-224-113-214-no111.tbcn.telia.com [90.224.113.214]) by vmlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C92BE1DDA9F2; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:21:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B4F98CA.1040208@vmlinux.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:21:00 -0000 From: Joachim Nilsson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Yann E. MORIN" CC: crossgcc Subject: Re: crosstool-ng: Dangling symlink "terminfo" from ncurses References: <4B487F29.3070907@vmlinux.org> <201001101854.40086.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> <4B4D0C2E.60903@vmlinux.org> <201001131941.13001.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> In-Reply-To: <201001131941.13001.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact crossgcc-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2 On 01/13/2010 07:41 PM, Yann E. MORIN wrote: >> Maybe a latent bug? >> > Yep, definitely... :-( The solution would be to build a static-only > libncurses, so even if gdb uses shared libc, it would not require shared > libncurses on the target, which could be entirely missing, or worse, > could be different from the one used to build gdb... I'll look at the > issue tonight. Thanks for raising it! > No problem. I noticed you solved it quite elegantly. :) Regards /Joachim -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq