From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20221 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2011 09:43:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 20211 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Dec 2011 09:43:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_SG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail201c2.megamailservers.com (HELO mail201c2.megamailservers.com) (69.49.111.102) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:42:44 +0000 X-Authenticated-User: konrad.gaisler.com Received: from [192.168.0.37] (gaisler.se [92.33.28.242]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail201c2.megamailservers.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id pB69gDZe032477; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 04:42:14 -0500 Message-ID: <4EDDE1B5.9040408@gaisler.com> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:43:00 -0000 From: Konrad Eisele User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110928 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Frysinger CC: crossgcc@sourceware.org, Ralf Corsepius , "Yann E. MORIN" Subject: Re: sparc leon toolchain 4.6.0 References: <4EDC86E4.6030202@gaisler.com> <4EDCD1C8.9020608@rtems.org> <201112051227.53498.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201112051227.53498.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=3vroozmhezBP+7RX62VLXHfNRE6fEyW8fj8TCBGQ830= c=1 sm=1 a=CIB-vgOadyEA:10 a=J_fnW-vIlMEA:10 a=U62ajLuCel8A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=jXKJviUpWSOlMmIvGrHOfw==:17 a=A8oJy8mYAAAA:8 a=qtxjEtzKgFGrVgOz_jMA:9 a=3qBewO5IfXACcQ7w9H8A:7 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=pHhloFHTM_wA:10 a=jXKJviUpWSOlMmIvGrHOfw==:117 Mailing-List: contact crossgcc-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 05 December 2011 09:14:32 Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 12/05/2011 09:55 AM, Konrad Eisele wrote: >>> Here is a seperated patch for gcc 4.6.0 + binutils 2.21.1 for SPARC-LEON. >> >> These patches belong into upstream gcc and binutils. >> >> Forking gcc/binutils as part of crossgcc isn't helpful. > > what Ralf said -mike I agree but I keep sending patches that are not applied. The binutil patch for instance where sent but ignored. The gcc patch will be ignored too. It was ebotcazou@adacore.com that decided that sparc-leon[3] should be the target-vendor standard. I sent the [sf|hf]leon[v8] variant but it was removed. He has the commit right, so he decides, I cannot do anything about it. For the time beeing it might as well be present in crosstools. -- Konrad -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq